On 1/5/06, Nevius, Gordon D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gordon,
Thanks for answering my question. One limitation of this technique seems to be that you have to leave the search function and go into a print function to complete one's search. That seems awkward.
Also, could you save the combination of the two searches to yet another sort template? I.e. if you didn't want to print the output, be just create the sort template.
I wish there was the functionality you show, i.e. combining "sets" stored in sort templates. It wouldn't take much to add this.
Thanks again for your input.
Kevin
Kevin is not doing anything wrong, the Search can not do this because he is searching on the .01 field of the multiple and obviously the .01 field can not be equal to acetaminophen and alcohol at the same time, so Kevin needs to do a "double search".
Example entry:
==============
Select OPTION: INQUIRE TO FILE ENTRIES
-snip-
Gordon,
Thanks for answering my question. One limitation of this technique seems to be that you have to leave the search function and go into a print function to complete one's search. That seems awkward.
Also, could you save the combination of the two searches to yet another sort template? I.e. if you didn't want to print the output, be just create the sort template.
I wish there was the functionality you show, i.e. combining "sets" stored in sort templates. It wouldn't take much to add this.
Thanks again for your input.
Kevin
