On Jan 15, 2006, at 4:28 PM, Kevin Toppenberg wrote:
How about writing to a global:
+L set ^GLOBAL(^GLOBAL(0))=VALUE,^GLOBAL(0)=^GLOBAL(0)+1 -L
Kevin
That won't work (because of the lock). What I'd like to do is, in
some sense, the opposite of what you usually want to do with
concurrent processes. You generally, define critical sections in your
code (using locks or a similar construct) to prevent interference
from other concurrent processes, but I want to make the interference
visible, and the more dramatically the better.
===
Gregory Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Before one gets the right answer, one must ask the right question."
-- S. Barry Cooper
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Hardhats-members mailing list
Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
