Hmmm... I thought this looked familiar, so I searched back through the mail archives and sure enough I had asked the same question earlier. And you all gave great answers then.
The long and short is: @ does not overcome a ^ symbol. It is a programmer's lock. Thanks anyway. Kevin On 3/29/06, Kevin Toppenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I know I have been asked this a few times before, but I still am > having some difficulties with write permissions in Fileman. I have > tried reviewing the Fileman manual and still can't find my answer. > > I want to add entries to the VA GENERIC file (50.6). > > I look, and the file has a LAYGO code of "^". My DUZ(0)="@" > > The .01 field has a write access of "^". > > Why can't I create entries in the file? I am rejected using both ^DIC > and UPDATE^DIE. > > As an aside, there is know real way of knowing if I am supposed to be > adding entries to this file without understanding the entire package, > right? I mean that its possible that this file is supposed to be > generated automatically by some trigger when a record is added into > some other file. Otherwise, why would the creators of the file put > this restriction on the file? > > Again, my ultimate goal right now is to add entries into the VA > PRODUCT file. But one of the fields in such a record needs to point > to the VA GENERIC file. And I am adding novel drugs, so I need to add > novel VA GENERIC entries. > > Thanks > Kevin > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Hardhats-members mailing list Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
