OK guys, it appears to be do-able. Who will be first to achieve a compile? I don't have one of these new intel mac mini's, but I really want to buy one! And if GT.M runs on it, I think I can justify it!
Kevin On 4/12/06, Bhaskar, KS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 12:05 -0500, Kevin Toppenberg wrote: > > [KSB] <...snip...> > > > Bhaskar, are you saying that it should not be difficult to get GT.M > > running on OS-X? Is Sanchez OK with this? > > Since GT.M has already been reported to run on FreeBSD on x86, I am not > aware of any reason that GT.M cannot be made to run on OS X on Intel by > someone who knows what s/he is doing. Of course, my not being aware of > a reason doesn't mean that there isn't some as yet unknown > insurmountable obstacle to doing it. > > Apropos your second question, Fidelity has no objection to anyone doing > it. Since the importance of a FOSS license such as the GPL, under > which GT.M on x86 GNU/Linux is released, is empowerment of the licensee > user, even if someone at Fidelity objected, it wouldn't matter anyway. > Proprietary software licenses put power in the hands of the vendor. > FOSS licenses put power in the hands of the user. > > -- Bhaskar > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Hardhats-members mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
