I notice that one agenda item from the upcoming meeting is managing development on a large scale. Of course, I have no idea what is planned for this session, but I wonder why the familiar model of using a subversion or CVS repository with a select group of committers wouldn't work. Obviously, this would only apply to either Hardhats' or WorldVista's namespace, and not to the standard (for lack of a better term) VistA applications, and obviously all component types (routines, DDs, file data, options, protocols, templates, etc.) would need to be included in the repository. But why would this not work?
=== Gregory Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Metaphors be with you. ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Hardhats-members mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
