On Jun 25, 2006, at 4:54 PM, Dan wrote:
I'm not saying you're wrong (I don't know the DD for this file at all), but in general, if a ^DIC lookup produces multiple matches, they will be numbered sequentially (1, 2, ...). Situations like this can occur when you do a multi-index lookup, and the indexed field is neither .01 nor an identifier. If this turns out to be the problem, you might consider explicitly selecting an index or indices to be used for lookup. Also, if the number of matches is out of synch with your data, check to see which indices are being used and whether they need to be rebuilt. Gregory Woodhouse "Judge a man by his questions not his answers." --Voltaire |
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________ Hardhats-members mailing list Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
