On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 16:17:23 -0600, CW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think, though, we are comparing apples to oranges in terms of general > usage. While you make reference to "hardened" IE configurations, I can argue > you could go to the same extent with any browser.. or moreso, but it's > largely irrelevent as the goal is to make the browser "out of the box" better > then it's competitor, as that's the way 99% of people will leave it.
Agreed. I would trust the standard "user" with FF far more then IE. First off, it is more secure out of the box. Secondly, it isn't hooked into the OS the way that IE is so if FF gets hosed, it isn't going to hose your Windoze install. -- Brian
