I'm with you, but, the argument is at "we" will (thru gov't intervention) go laming on all these right thinking folk that will have to pay for our free thinking individual actions.....
I see no solution here. 2many folk wanna blame 2many for external extractions from their pockets even though they allowed it to take place. What this discussion is about is personal bias. Nothing else.
I still do not have a good answer.
At 16:08 03/16/2005 -0500, you wrote:
There's another one I don't like. Hey, I can't help it if some bleeding heart wants to pay for treating a smokers cancer... if someone engages in risky behavior, they take what they get. The problem is that people want to steal your and my money to "fix" stuff that's really none of their damn business. If I fuck up, I don't go crying to the government for help.
Julian
At 10:43 AM 3/16/2005, you wrote:It's in the same category as requiring motorcycle riders to wear helmets
or car occupants to wear seat belts. When one engages in risky (prohibited) activities, the innocent taxpayers often wind up paying the resulting medical bills.
Gary VanderMolen
Best, Duncan
This email scanned for Viruses and Spam by ZCloud.net
