voip isn't regulated (yet) vonage would be well within it's rights to say go screw, we've got a cheap service, this is what it offers, take it or leave it
i guess i don't see what's wrong with it On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 15:33:37 -0500 (EST), Christopher Fisk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Gary VanderMolen wrote: > > > That's a good compromise, but how can a judge force Vonage > > to implement a default 911 if the plaintiff loses the suit? > > Best scenario is for Vonage to lose the suit, be fined $1.00 > > and ordered to implement a default 911 routing. That > > would be a win-win. > > Losing the lawsuit sets the blame on Vonage, and will open them up to many > many many more lawsuits (As well as setting case law that will affect the > entire telecom industry). The worst I would like to see here is a > settlement where vonage denies all blame, but agrees to implement the > required 911 signup. > > This would be a landmark case that sets precident if Vonage were to lose. > It wouldn't just affect Vonage. > > > Christopher Fisk > -- > BOFH Excuse #16: > somebody was calculating pi on the server > -- -jmg Chaos often breeds life, when order breeds habit. Henry Brooks Adams [1838-1918]
