At 06:31 AM 6/2/2005, Thane Sherrington typed:
Well, they aren't anonymous to me. :) I'm just not supposed to release
the information to the managers or employees.
Some one must read the reviews besides the employee [& you] otherwise why
have the reviews ? The person [whoever that might be] that reads the
resulting reviews should not only be reading what the supervisor said about
the employee but can also infer certain characteristics about the reviewer.
For example if Joe User wrote that I was a Dell Lover what could you infer
from what you've read? <lol> When one reads this they could infer certain
things about me &/or the author which in this case would be Joe User. A
manager that has 5 supervisors working for him with 10 people working for
each supervisor. The manager not only learns about the people at the bottom
of the barrel but also each of the supervisors from the reviews that they
had written with any # of combinations of results being possible. You could
be a good super but hate giving reviews or you could be a super that is too
hard on their people & all this gathered from the evaluations that you
wrote or it could be simply that I'm having a bad day & don't like what you
wrote about your employees. ;-) This is why the whole process should be
as objective as possible & that the person being reviewed should have a
chance to comment to the reviewer as well.
Maybe they ought to review their whole review process. <LOL>
----------+----------
Wayne D. Johnson
Ashland, OH, USA 44805
<http://www.wavijo.com>
