Seems to me that the Bayesian filters should be just fine, they just need to run a spell check against the message prior to ranking and scoring it. FWIW, I already get several SPAM messages a day that are already doing this.....
-Gary Veech Malone said the following on 7/11/2005 4:40 PM: > Half the spam I get already has purposely misspelled words in the > subject line or punctuation marks instead of letters. There oughtta > be a law against it. > > Thane Sherrington wrote: > >> At 07:04 PM 06/07/2005, Veech Malone wrote: >> >> >>> Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer >>> in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is >>> taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can >>> be a total mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is >>> bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but, >>> the wrod as a wlohe. >> >> >> >> Just wait until spammers start using this. Bayesian'll be screwed. >> >> T >> > >
