Nothing really wrong with it, but TrueImage is faster, lets you decide how compressed you want the image to be, lets you mount the image, and very reliably verifies the image - PQ was a little wanting in that last item by my experience.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Winterlight Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 1:53 PM To: The Hardware List Subject: RE: [H] Replacing Ghost At 10:37 AM 10/14/2005, you wrote: >I use Acronis True Image - and before that Drive Image by Powerquest, >neither let me down, but Symantec bought out Powerquest. I still use the last version of Drive Image.... and it works great. Why would I need to switch? >I would rate TrueImage a 10/10 - Fast, dependable, easy to use > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thane Sherrington >(S) >Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 11:58 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: [H] Replacing Ghost > >I use Ghost a lot to backup users' hard drives when reinstalling Windows, >but from time to time, when backing up a failing hard drive, I get an error >that tells me there has been an internal inconsistency, and that Ghost >can't continue, and it exits. I'm using Ghost with the following command >line: > >ghost -ntc- -ntic -ntiid -bfc -fro -crcignore > >Which I think does everything to make Ghost as fault tolerant as possible. > >Is there something that will take Ghost's place and backup damaged hard >drives? I don't mind if it can't copy all the files, just copy as much as >it can. > >I have GetDataBack, but that doesn't really do what I want, as it rather >time intensive for a simple recovery like this, where I don't really care >about the data in the damaged areas. > >T
