At 01:24 PM 04/11/2005, warpmedia wrote:
Could it be that 7200rpm drives with ultra low random seek times, larger cache and better cache algorithms have rendered defrag a waste of time? Law of diminishing returns?
That's what I'm thinking. I will continue to test as I have time. I will note the following for the tests:
1)Model of drive 2)Level of fragmentionT
