The latter. Runs in its own window, with many attributes for each session independently definable.
Works very well here (3.2Ghz P4 1Gb RAM) Regards ____________________________________ Neil Atwood - Sydney, Australia http://westserve.org - Blog, Christianity, Coffee and Tech Stuff. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Winterlight Sent: Friday, 9 December 2005 3:38 PM To: The Hardware List Subject: Re: [H] VirtualPC?? At 08:22 PM 12/8/2005, you wrote: >I use Virtual Server 2005 and Virtual PC 2004 at work, and VMware 5 at home. > >I prefer VMware. I find it more configurable than the Microsoft solutions, >and more resource efficient. I do like Virtual Server's chainable >differencing disks...I'm not sure if VMware's server products offer a >similar feature. >Greg Interesting, I use VMWare 5.5 as well. One thing I am not clear about with MS Virtual PC. Is it in some way tied to the host OS, and appears as a drive? Or does it run completely separate, in a window, from a image file, the way VM is? I like the VM window a lot, I can run it on another display or just minimize it and it does what I want it to do without getting in the way.
