Are you telling me that the spam bots aren't smart enough to detect the supposedly hidden email address in the form but they are smart enough to decode hex? If that's the case then the bots are reading the rendered html & not the real source so if one uses an image to click on to start a mailto: then a bot can't read that either ? So bots can not read the source html. Hmmm, I thought bots were smarter than that. Of course it depends on the bot. ;-)

At 04:23 PM 12/21/2005, Neil Atwood typed:
I rarely disagree with your take on matters technical Wayne, but I do here.

Well have a Merry Christmas anyway. ;-)

I have built and I currently maintain several dozen websites. Most of them pretty simple jobs using a CMS to reduce the amount of hand coding required. In every case I use NO email links at all. They all use forms for the primary means of contact. In the 10 or so contacts a day I get from those sites, I have had no complaints about using a form, and - this is the important bit - NO spam on the addresses those forms send to. Many of these sites have been up for 2-3 years.

I've used all the hex and JS tricks to 'hide' email addresses. Some work better than others, but all of them ultimately fail and those addresses will attract spam sooner or later. The spambots are getting very sophisticated these days and these simple tricks are not fooling them.

Then why do forms work? It's because of calling an external cgi or perl script but the simplest forms don't use these & this is the same technology that can be used to hide email addresses in html. It's not that forms are more secure but that calling scripts is more secure from bots. I wager that as much spam comes from not paying to have ones domain hidden in whois.

You may not ever learn to love it, but learn to put up with the form, for the moment it's here to stay... ;-)

I'm afraid you're correct but I'll keep resisting anyway & maybe it's because of the school of hard knocks that I do.

----------+----------
   Wayne D. Johnson
Ashland, OH, USA 44805
<http://www.wavijo.com>

Reply via email to