From: "Neil Atwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], The Hardware List
<[email protected]>
To: "'The Hardware List'" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [H] OT - Intelligent Design dealt harsh blow by NJ Judge
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:23:39 +1100
> True would mean factual, and facts are not a part of faith. But lets not
> have logic, facts, and truth get in the way of your reasoning, after all
> it's just religion.
That's just your opinion - which you have given no supporting argument for.
I'm generally opposed to 'religion' (in the way it's commonly used), what I
have is personal relationship with Jesus, based predominantly on the
historical truths about him (see my post to Stan).
I don't expect you to begin to understand or accept that, and I won't abuse
you because of the opinions you hold. I wonder if you will return the
courtesy?
Regards
No actually you are wrong again. Faith is DEFINED as the belief in something
that you can not provide proof of, but believe nonetheless. It is debatable
whether or not Rabbi Jesus actually existed (hinted in the very gospels) but
I'll tend to think he did - however him being the king of the jews, the son
of God and those who do not accept this are going to a firey underground
bunker (which you were implying of me) is entirely a leap of faith. There is
no material evidence you can provide to back up these assumptions. Hint:
testable hypothesis!
