I'm not the one on the high horse wanting to ban people from the list
who don't meet your vaunted expectations mister! Furthermore, I work 2nd
shift and answer my mail in the order I read it which is often in the
wee hours of the night. You're not the list owner or the moderator so I
suggest you mind your own business and let them do theirs. It's not up
to you what people talk about and you're not an authority on anything in
my opinion. @:|>
Greg Sevart wrote:
Off-list reply...
Oh get off your high horse. I love a good debate as much as anyone. This
didn't qualify primarily for two reasons:
1. There was absolutely zero chance that either side or any opinion
would change as a result, and
2. Each side made abundantly clear their utter lack of respect for the
other's position.
Without these two elements, a debate degrades into a thoughtless argument.
Additionally, you're the idiot that couldn't leave the thread alone
after it had been declared dead by the list owner TWICE.
Your posts on the topic: 18
My posts on the topic: 1 (which addressed only my belief that this
decision should have been handled locally instead of in court)
I think that speaks volumes.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Stan Zaske" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "The Hardware List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2005 12:47 AM
Subject: Re: [H] OT - Intelligent Design dealt harsh blow by NJ Judge
Well, Merry Christmas to you too! Why don't you ban yourself if you
can't handle the fact that others may not share your viewpoint on
everything. How very Republican and Conservative Christian of you to
exclude those who don't bow down to you and fall into line like good
little troopers! Scrooge! @:(>
Greg Sevart wrote:
At 12:50 PM 12/23/2005, you wrote:
Look, this thread needs to die asap.
Thank you!
Ditto. Can we just ban those that do not heed? :)
Marked -OT- or not, this one had no place on this list. Shame on
everyone.
