Where did you hear that because its definitely not the case -----Original Message----- From: "Greg Sevart"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: 3/3/06 10:16:07 AM To: "The Hardware List"<[email protected]> Subject: Re: [H] Antivirus
I can confirm. SAV-CE is a completely different codebase from the crap consumer grade stuff that is Norton branded. 10.0.2 is taking 33MB of memory on thix box (I have 2GB), which I don't consider very bad. I still argue it is among (if not the) best AV scanner available--it just isn't available to the average consumer. Most people (for good reason) hate the Norton consumer stuff, and assume that the corporate stuff is related...but nothing could be further from the truth. Interestingly, I've heard that SAV-CE10 also is the most effective malware scanner out there--but it runs slower than anything else at this task. Greg ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hayes Elkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 11:18 AM Subject: RE: [H] Antivirus > The latest Symantec AntiVirus corporate edition client (10.0.2.2020) takes > about 30MB of memory footprint these days. It does however do a much > better job than the retail home user version (norton), however it will get > more false positives. > > >>From: Jin-Wei Tioh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Reply-To: The Hardware List <[email protected]> >>To: The Hardware List <[email protected]> >>Subject: RE: [H] Antivirus >>Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 10:54:49 -0600 >> >>At 02:28 PM 3/2/2006, you wrote: >>>Norton is definitely not even close to kaspersky in detection accuracy. >> >>Not to mention that it seems to be more resource heavy. Always hated >>the startup time degradations with Norton. Much improved after I >>switched to Kaspersky. >> >>-- >>JW >> > > >
