Might want to start buying Intel
stock while the price is low.
Intel Unveils Details of New Chip Design
http://www.sci-tech-today.com/news/Intel-Unveils-Details-of-New-Chip-Design/story.xhtml?story_id=013001G9414J
Jin-Wei Tioh wrote:
At 10:47 PM 3/7/2006, you wrote:
Oh snap! Nice to see that Intel isn't
resting on their laurels... Competition is healthy and I don't think
that this chip would be where it is if it were not for AMD. I've been
a AMD nut for awhile, but Intel is starting to look better with this.
I didn't notice, did they mention heat/power consumption?
_____________________________________
Julian Zottl
CTO, Radiant Network Technology, LLC
Getting ahead in the tech sector isn't about kissing butt ... you gotta
sniff the right packets
Yup, 65W TDP at 2.6GHz IINM. Looks like AMD really hurt Intel's
feelings with the A64 at full load vs. the P4 at idle ;)
Fanboys seem to be coming out of the woodwork on most major forums (AT,
[H], etc.). Lots of conspiracy theories flying
around (eg. why did the FX-60 appear as "unknown" in the BIOS, unequal
graphics driver settings, unknown "optimizations",
old BIOS version, etc.) and apparently lots of measurements of
e-appendages.
I think all the folks here are level-headed enough not to blindly
subscribe to brand loyalty. :)
That said, the performance increase in F.E.A.R is nothing short of
astounding. That's the kind of performance increase you'd
expect to see out of a decent GPU upgrade.
--
JW
|
- Re: [H] [N] IDF 2006 - Conroe Performance Stan Zaske
-
