Anand posted a followup that addresses the vast majority of his concerns:
http://www.anandtech.com/tradeshows/showdoc.aspx?i=2716
The end result? The figures are still mostly spot on. Conroe still kicks
ass.
The FEAR numbers were off--but as a result of Anand's initial error, NOT
anything Intel did.
Greg
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Reeves" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'The Hardware List'" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 3:19 PM
Subject: [H] Were Intel's benchmarks (slightly) rigged?
Not denouncing their benchmarks entirely - I believe Intel's benchmarks of
their own chip are valid, and I think they have a winner on their hands.
But someone evaluating them raises some real questions about the
comparison:
http://voodoopc.blogspot.com/2006/03/if-only-they-had-time-machine.html
