I guess that I just feel that a comprehensive backup solution should be
primarily for irreplaceable or original content--documents, home movies,
pictures, etc. IMO, redundancy (mirror or striping with parity) is a
sufficient level of protection for mass content that you speak of. 

My biggest concern, however, is with big manufacturers starting to ship out
high-performance machines with striped arrays for the marginal (if any)
performance improvement, with no warning of the increased risk of data loss.

Greg

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hardware-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of j maccraw
> Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 3:14 PM
> To: The Hardware List
> Subject: Re: [H] Here comes the terabyte hard drive
> 
> Downloaded content like music & video comes to mind.
> Backup will be #2
> use for Blue-ray or HDDVD burners when the become
> cheap enough.
> 
> Certainly not often or even in frequent 1 shot full
> backup situation,
> but needs some degree of backup none the less. If my
> 100GB+ of Mp3's
> died I'd loose both time & money replacing them if not
> for some degree
> of backups. So I incremental backup to DVD-R every few
> months, full once
> a year or so.
> 
> In a few years households will have multi-TB NAS
> setups (likely with
> built in high capacity discs burners or removable &/or
> spare HDD's for
> backups) simply because "files" is how all content is
> going to end up
> and inaccessibility will be king. MP3 & Video's like
> TV shows/movies
> which are just easier to enjoy when stored centrally
> and accessed from
> menus rather than digging out a CD or DVD disc.
> 
> Storage is cheap, buy a few 1TB drives, use one for
> main storage,
> another for online backups, a 3rd for offline backups,
> etc...
> 
> Greg Sevart wrote:
> > Is there really 1.0TB of home user data that needs
> to be backed up? I run
> > nightly backups on my machine. Out of over 4TB,
> there's only about 15GB that
> > I consider essential enough to back up.
> >
> > On the commercial side, the problem already exists
> with storage arrays of
> > multiple TB or more. High-dollar LTO-3 autoloaders
> can resolve the backup
> > situation there.
> >
> > Greg
> >


Reply via email to