Maybe I'm just reading it wrong - I thought that since all the values were higher than the threshold that it was bad. Is it the other way around?
-- Brian On 4/30/07, Thane Sherrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 12:47 PM 29/04/2007, Brian Weeden wrote: >Check out this SMART data: > >http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pIkHR2B_QrGWJ_R1O8OmRPw&output=html > >It's from a WD 80GB SATA2 drive I just purchased to replace one that >was failing. I'm no expert but something is fishy. Either the drive >is ready to drop dead any day now or the SMART data isn't being read / >stored properly. What are you seeing that's bad? I see nothing to suggest that it's bad. Have you run a self-test? T
