equivalent being the keyword, what they need to know regardless.

I did have a emachine activation declined once because I was dumb enough to 
admit replacing the mb with something *better* live an learn.
still boils down to MS does not want to deal with end users or small time 
system, builders. IMO
fp



At 01:59 PM 9/1/2007, Greg Sevart Poked the stick with:
>You all do realize that Vista's OEM one-motherboard-only policy is not new
>to Vista, right? Windows XP OEM/system builder licenses have had the -exact-
>same restriction. Identical (within reason) replacements only. With Vista,
>it appears that they're just enforcing that a little more aggressively.
>
>>From the Microsoft OEM/System Builder's website:
>
>Q. Can a PC with OEM Windows XP have its motherboard upgraded and keep the
>same license? What if it was replaced because it was defective? 
>
>A. Generally, you may upgrade or replace all of the hardware components on
>your customer's computer and the end user may maintain the license for the
>original MicrosoftR OEM operating system software, with the exception of an
>upgrade or replacement of the motherboard. An upgrade of the motherboard is
>considered to result in a "new personal computer" to which MicrosoftR OEM
>operating system software cannot be transferred from another computer. If
>the motherboard is upgraded or replaced for reasons other than a defect,
>then a new computer has been created and the license of new operating system
>software is required. If the motherboard is replaced because it is
>defective, you do NOT need to acquire a new operating system license for the
>PC as long as the replacement motherboard is the same make/model or the same
>manufacturer's replacement/equivalent, as defined by the manufacturer's
>warranty.
>
>Greg
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tharin Olsen
>> Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2007 10:59 AM
>> To: The Hardware List
>> Subject: Re: [H] Vista, dumb question, maybe
>> 
>> I've read online articles that pretty much all say the same thing about
>> OEM
>> versions of Windows Vista. You are allowed to change any component but
>> the
>> motherboard. Microsoft has made the motherboard the core component of
>> the PC
>> and if you change it with a different one it counts as a new machine.
>> Your
>> Vista installation would require relicensing and a new product key.
>> Apparently you are allowed to change the motherboard for a new one if
>> it is
>> a replacement of a defective board and it is the same make/model of the
>> existing board.
>> 
>> Now as a system builder and service/repair shop I think this sucks.
>> It's not
>> often that I can obtain exact make/model mainboards to repair systems.
>> Tier-1 systems like Dell, HP, Sony, etc. who are past their warranty,
>> sometimes 90 days on the cheapo units, have replacement motherboards
>> listing
>> online for $100-$400. In the past I would just pull the cpu and ram and
>> drop
>> in a factory new board from MSI, Asrock, ECS, etc. for $50. Then all I
>> would
>> need to do is phone up Microsoft whilst stuck on the XP product
>> activation
>> box and explain the reason for reactivation was to replace a defective
>> mainboard with a new one. Not once have they not authorized an
>> activation.
>> Hopefully, they will continue to do so with these sort of
>> circumstances.
>> 
>> As to the folks who are simply switching boards because they need the
>> extra
>> expansion slots, more ram than their two dimm board would allow, etc. I
>> think they shouldn't have to pay but like a reactivation fee of 2 cents
>> or
>> something. Why? Because it isnt a second computer! The end user would
>> still
>> have only one machine running Windows. Perhaps a break in pricing to
>> convert
>> their OEM license to a full retail license. Go halfsies on it.
>> 
>> -Tharin O.
>> 
>> FORC5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> OEM license states can not be transfered to another machine once
>> installed,
>> would a major HW change ( motherboard ) be construed as a different
>> machine
>> ?
>> I would think not but not my sandbox. :'(
>> 
>> deeper and deeper
>> fp
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Tallyho ! ]:8)
>> Taglines below !
>> --
>> Future looks spotty. You will spill soup in late evening.
>> 
>> 

-- 
Tallyho ! ]:8)
Taglines below !
--
If a man speaks in a forest, and his wife is not there to hear him, is he still 
wrong?


Reply via email to