DHSinclair wrote:
> OK......inline below......
> At 22:56 11/12/2007 -0800, you wrote:
>> Modem in bridge mode should not be doing anything
but
>> giving you a live IP
>> (internet rout able, not 192.168.x.x) on the WAN
port
>> of your router.
> 
> Define "live IP."  UMean a route-able IP transfers
through the
> modem to the router. The router deals with it?

Yes, live as in the internet routable IP your DSL
provider allocates to you. 
Yes, the router should be doing the PPoE effectively
making your modem only act 
as a modem rather than the stock modem/router combo it
came configured as.

Bottom line is if the modem is in bridge mode, the
router configured for PPoE, 
then the router's WAN port should be getting a live IP
not a private one. This 
makes the link between the router and the internet
appear to be direct as if 
there was no modem.

> 
> 
>> Also, if you were running a 192.168.x.x/24 net from
>> the modem to router's WAN
>> and then a 192.168.x.x/16 on the router's LAN side
no
>> wonder you had troubles. 2
>> interfaces, same subnet, router in the middle-
where
>> would the router send the
>> packet?  Since "default gateway" (LAN to WAN, WAN
to
>> LAN) means "if this packet
>> is destined for a subnet outside of the current
>> subnet, so send it to gateway to
>> be forwarded to outside subnets". Using the same
>> subnet on both LAN & WAN (in
>> gateway mode) would mean nothing routes across the
>> router because from the
>> router's & client systems' logic "Is this destined
for
>> my subnet? Yes." there is
>> no reason to.
> 
> OK. I sorta get this. And I am now working. I am
pissed that the modem
> and router can not somehow live on the same subnet,
but that is as it now
> is.  I will choose to leave well enough alone. I do
so apologize for 
> being so
> thick!

I am sure they could with some combination of settings
but why bother when modem 
bridge mode removes the issue?

> 
> 
> 
>> 1. Modem - Bridge mode
>> 2. Router WAN - PPoE, give it your DSL user & pw
>> 3. Router LAN - 10.0.0.1/8
>> 4. DHCP pool, start: 10.0.0.2, # of clients:
whatever
>> you need.
> 
> Yes, how it is roughly right now.
> Yes, this is about how it is set up.  Except, that I
do not do any DHCP.
> Yes, I do get the client pool.  I even know that my
router will let me
> "reserve" addy's outside the pool for those machines
that I choose to
> NOT do the release/renew DHCP business.  I am
thinking about this
> possibility.........................

If you still get a private 192.168.x.x address at the
router's WAN port, you are 
NOT in bridge mode.

You should really consider DHCP; Further you should
consider a DHCP setup that 
reserves  IP based on MAC address so that you can
assign the IP you want to a PC 
but do not have to do it at the PC itself because the
PC in DHCP mode will still 
get the right IP based on the lease.

> 
> 
>> If you had followed this method you would not have
had
>> an issue with your
>> 192.168.x.x setup assuredly with a CIDER /16 but
for
>> sure no problems with a
>> standard /24 class C subnet since the is nothing
magic
>> about class A subnet that
>> fixed your original issues. Not too mention all
this
>> hassle is why DHCP is
>> preferred over static to begin with since setting
up
>> the router &/or DHCP server
>> sets up every one else.
> 
> Yes, I know this now.  But I have now played with
this for many years.
> Excuse me for now remembering.  I will claim age for
my excuse.
> I do so enjoy your shares, but you can be really
hard sometimes.
> I do not set up networks every day.  I forget.
> 
> Anyway, I mean not to blow any of this off.  I have
gotten what I needed
> to get "online."  I am still trying to draw pix of
"subnets" based on 
> Tharin's
> sends.  My picture is sorta up to date thanks to you
and Tharin.  For this,
> I do thank you for you patience.  I am thankful that
you have stayed with
> the collective.  We would be much less without you.
> Thank you.
> Best,
> Duncan
<snip>


      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better pen pal. 
Text or chat with friends inside Yahoo! Mail. See how.  
http://overview.mail.yahoo.com/

Reply via email to