<shrug> People are still benching XP against Vista? That's
silly. We already know that XP is faster. (Now to be fair, the
machine only had 1GB of RAM. Had it been bumped to 2GB, Vista may
have done better.)
T
At 01:21 PM 05/12/2007, JRS wrote:
Not sure, but I read somewhere that XP with SP3 was tested aa 50%
faster than Vista with SP1 (both were betas of course) while doing
scripted computing tasks.
35 seconds for XP versus 80 seconds for Vista to complete..
That's a huge difference..
--
JRS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please remove **X** to reply...
Facts do not cease to exist just
because they are ignored.
----- Original Message ----
From: FORC5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, December 5, 2007 9:03:25 AM
Subject: Re: [H] Any WinXP SP3 users out there?
what they failed to say was 07 was 20% slower to start. >:-}
fp
At 06:48 AM 12/5/2007, Greg Sevart Poked the stick with:
>The press is going crazy about this. Unless there's been new testing since,
>the original report of 10% faster was ONE test performed by ONE person on
>ONE application suite--Office 2007. I very much doubt that SP3 is going to
>bring sweeping performance gains across the board.
>
>Yay, Word is 10% faster. Who cares?
>
>Greg
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hardware-
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of zaske
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 3:55 AM
>> To: The Hardware List
>> Subject: [H] Any WinXP SP3 users out there?
>>
>> Are there any MSDN or Technet subscribers on the list that have tried
>> the new beta of WinXP SP3? Its supposed to be much faster.
--
Tallyho ! ]:8)
Taglines below !
--
Warning: All prosecutors will be violated.
