On 31 Jan 2008, at 01:57, DHSinclair wrote:

Well, I do not know the actual construction of the 'suspect' heatsink. Thane is way up north. I am way south and west of him. Snot like I got to put 'eyes' on the problem. I read here it was of the new "heatpipe" varieties. I have no experience with a "heatpipe" type HS yet. I still live in the solid metal chunk heatsink world. They are tough to fail, but I have read about trouble here too! But, I do understand the basic physics that a "heatpipe" plays with. So, I agreed with Thane that it seems that the HS is toast and needs replacement. I was not aware that the heatpipe's might have some sort of liquid as a transfer agent. I thought the current crop of heatpipes used solid tubes to transfer heat to the "radiator." No matter, whether liquid-filled or solid, if any of the "pipes" have broken with the base, the device is toast IMHO. Perhaps I am way off base. I can hang with that.
Best,


For it to qualify as a heatpipe, it has to be a hollow tube filled with a liquid that has a low boiling point (in a lot of cases this is merely extremely low pressure water)

I've never heard of one failing, but I suppose it's possible for one to spring a leak or something of that nature.

-JB

Reply via email to