I have seen a ton of debates over whether or not 32-bit XP can address 4GB
or not recently.  They talked about it on ExtremeTech, on DL.TV, and a few
other places.  If I remember correctly, there is a way to get XP to display
all 4GB but as was pointed out by Bobby you can't actually use all 4 GB.

As far as the question about a RAM drive, if Windows can't access the
physical RAM then you would have to have some program make the RAM drive
before Windows starts up, I don't think you could do it from within
Windows..  And of course there is also the question of whether your BIOS
supports more than 4 GB.  Some do, some don't.

-----
Brian Weeden
Technical Consultant
Secure World Foundation


On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Bobby Heid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I don't think so.  32-bit OSes can only address 4GB RAM.  The thing is
> that
> your video card RAM, BIOS, etc have to map into that 4GB address space
> also.
> That is why you lose approx 750MB RAM when you have 4GB.  The RAM is still
> there, it is just not addressed.
>
> Kind of like this:
>
> Physical RAM    Memory Mapping
> |-----  4GB     |-----  4.00GB
> |                       |                       Graphics card memory,
> BIOS,
> etc.
> |                       |-----  3.25GB
> |                       |
> |                       |
> |                       |
> |                       |
> |                       |
> |                       |
> |                       |
>
> Bobby
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thane Sherrington
> Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2008 8:11 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [H] RAM ceiling 3.25GB ...maybe not
>
> At 04:15 AM 08/03/2008, Winterlight wrote:
>
> >This is in this months Maximum PC page 23 sidebar.
> >
> >-------------------------------------------
> >Our RAM configuration isn't that simple, though. Although the board
> >posts just fine with 4GB, running a 32-bit windows OS doesn't quite
> >give you full access to the RAM. Check Windows XP and it'll report
> >only 3.25GB free. So is the other .75GB wasted? Not quite. It's a
> >complicated issue, but Microsoft argues that even if the
> >applications cannot use all 4GB of RAM, the OS, and even the
> >drivers, will, so the additional headroom does help.
> >-------------------------------------------
>
> Side question on this.  If I had 8GB of RAM, and 32 bit XP, could I
> create a 5GB RAM drive, and use it for temp and swap files while
> still using the other 3GB for Windows?  Wouldn't that give me, in
> effect, the advantage of 8GB of RAM since I'd be paging at RAM speed?
>
> T
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to