Stan,
Thank you for this link. I finally read it. It does fill in some of the
nVidia gaps in my overall comprehension of what has happened since the
GeForce 4 series of cards. Post GF4, nVidia just got too confusing for me
to follow and way too expensive. At that time, ATI was not the obvious
competitor it is now. I still own some nVidia FX5500 cards, but they are
just transitional for me; I got them just to replace even old GF3 and GF2
nvidia cards that finally completed their RTF process. Based on my read of
this review, nVidia still has some work to do at their top end, but due to
that, I am more reluctant to even continue with their mid or higher level
product.
I am going to go back and re-look at that MSI ATI radion card you suggested
several days ago. Heck, since I am now back to trying Intel cpus again, I
may as well broaden my experience and dabble with an ATI-based video
card. Thank you.
Best,
Duncan
At 23:19 11/21/2008 -0600, you wrote:
As I've stated previously, I'm pro-AMD. Having said that you might be
interested in this article.
http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3462
snip