Hi speed DSL, phone and TV all in one.
http://www.att-services.net/att-u-verse.html?mv1=A1200131&gclid=CL3r24Dx8pkC
FR7yDAod3WHRSQ

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sam Franc
Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2009 12:12
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [H] HDTV Math

What is Uverse400?
Sam

mark.dodge wrote:
> I do not know where to get any figures to give a size or fps figures but
all
> I know is that after switching from Direct TV to UVerse400 I have seen a
> significant improvement in the quality of the picture and very little
> pixelization in all HD channels. I had very frequent, daily problems with
> dropped signal, loss of audio, freezing and very bad pixelization on all
of
> the broadcast stations along with Discovery Showtime and HBO and skipping
> sound on ESPN2 just to name a few. I do not get it but once or twice a
week
> on UVerse. I am very happy with the switch and I had been with D-TV for
> close to 6 years.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brian Weeden
> Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 07:39
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [H] HDTV Math
>
> If you looked at satellite HD broadcasts I would suspect you would find
even
> worse bitrates among several of the HD stations.
>
> It all comes down to bandwidth - the cable satellite operators have
limited
> bandwidth and are trying to cram as many stations in as possible, and in
> many case this means highly compressing some stations.  Usually they try
to
> make sure that HD signals where it is most likely to be noticed (Discovery
> HD, PPV movies and live sports) get the best signal while other pseudo HD
> channels like History or HGTV will get re-compressed like crazy.
>
> ---------------------------
> Brian Weeden
> Technical Consultant
> Secure World Foundation <http://www.secureworldfoundation.org>
> +1 (514) 466-2756 Canada
> +1 (202) 683-8534 US
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 1:35 AM, James Maki <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
>   
>> I discovered something this week and am trying to understand its
>> ramifications. I noticed lots of pixelation and motion blur the last two
>> weeks of Heroes. NBC broadcasts at 1080i for HDTV. I checked the
>>     
> statistics
>   
>> for the show I recorded via HD Homerun tuners using Comcast cable, and
NBC
>> is averaging about 4.8 GB per hour for a 1080i show. I thought is a bit
>>     
> low
>   
>> but was even more surprised when I checked out shows on the other
>>     
> broadcast
>   
>> networks.
>>
>> ABC     720p/60fps              6.3 GB
>> NBC     1080i/29.97fps  4.8 GB
>> CBS     1080i/29.97fps  5.6 GB
>> PBS     720p/60fps              5.4 GB
>> CW      1080i/29.97fps  7.9 GB
>> FOX     720p/60fps              7.3 GB
>>
>> I find it strange that NBC has the lowest total file size but is
>> broadcasting at 1080i, so I assuming (and I know the drawback of that!)
it
>> is compressed more than the other channels and am again assuming that is
>> why
>> I am seeing the picture degradation. Calling Comcast is a joke, so I
>>     
> wanted
>   
>> to do the math to calculate the 'bits-per-second" for each case, but am
>>     
> not
>   
>> exactly sure if I am doing this correctly. It would seem that 4.8 GB/hr
>> would calculate as:
>>
>> 4.8 GB/hr * 1 hr/60 min * 1 min/60 sec * 1024 MB/GB * 8 Mb/MB = 10.9
Mbps.
>>
>> One online source indicated that for quality 1080i you should have at
>>     
> least
>   
>> 15 Mbps.
>>
>> For the FOX network, the calculation would give 16.6 Mbps, far better
than
>> the 12 Mbps my online source gave for quality 720p broadcasts.
>>
>> I can't understand why the 720p broadcast is actually providing better
>> throughput than the 1080i. It seems backwards (which is why I am
wondering
>> if my math is correct). I am not sure how to factor in the fps figures,
if
>> at all.
>>
>> If you can add some insight, it would be appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jim Maki
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>>     
>
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
> Version: 8.5.287 / Virus Database: 270.11.51/2052 - Release Date: 04/10/09
06:39:00
>
>   

Reply via email to