only meant programs that installed unto themselves, did not interweave with 
anything or anybody else and del is all that is needed to get rid of them.

That said sandboxie may be worth looking into for grins.
fp
BTW Happy 4th, may be the last one as we knew it comrade.

At 11:24 AM 7/4/2009, DSinc Poked the stick with:
>fp,
>Can you define "DOS"?  My read is ANY Windows OS has a DOS GrandFather.
>Sorry, I missed this one............. :)
>Best,
>Duncan
>
>
>FORC5 wrote:
>>Sandboxie sounds a lot like *DOS* full circle.
>>I loved things not being dependent on windows to run. easier to get rid of 
>>too.
>>fp
>>At 10:51 AM 7/4/2009, Brian Weeden Poked the stick with:
>>>I use it as well and love it.  One great way to keep nasties from your  
>>>web browser from getting into the rest of your system.
>>>
>>>There's a great episode of the Security Now! podcast dedicated to it.
>>>
>>>Be aware that it is not compatible with Vista/Win 7 64-bit due to the  
>>>way they changed the security architecture.
>>>
>>>
>>>-------------
>>>Brian Weeden
>>>Technical Advisor
>>>Secure World Foundation
>>>
>>>On 4-Jul-09, at 1:25 PM, DSinc <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Zool,
>>>>I have it; have kept it up to date, but have never tried it yet!
>>>>Sandboxie.com comes highly suggested on the ESET/Wilders security  
>>>>forums.
>>>>However, I suspect that many/most of the shares on this forum might  
>>>>have bigger "tin-hats" than I. I just do not know.
>>>>Much of this "virtual" area stuff still leaves me scratching my head.
>>>>Although, since moving to ESET, I've been infection-free (2006).
>>>>Thanks again, Thane!!!!
>>>>Best,
>>>>Duncan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Naushad Zulfiqar wrote:
>>>>>Has anyone tried this software?
>>>>>The concept looks good.
>>>>>http://www.sandboxie.com/
>>>>-- 
>>>>Tallyho ! ]:8)
>>>>Taglines below !
>>>>--
>>>>Good taste is the flower of good sense.
>
>-- 
>Tallyho ! ]:8)
>Taglines below !
>--
>I thought I was wrong once, but I was mistaken.

Reply via email to