On 11/10/10 7:45 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> Their alternate one is 9w, which is 1w higher. I think the 18w is designed to
> counter the clv chips on intel's side.
>
Actually, the current atom D4xx is 10w for a single core, and the D5xx
is 13w for a dual core.
The Ontario is 9w, and the Zacate is 18w.
Ontario is single core, and Zacate is dual core, but you have to keep in
mind that both the core and the GPU/APU part of the processor are far
faster then an Atom D4xx and D5xx.
The Bobcat core is a out of order core, vs Atom which is in-order, and
the GPU parts are insanely different.
It is quite possible that an Zacate based system running the same work
load as an Atom D5xx will actually draw less power.
Harry
> ------Original Message------
> From: Eli Allen
> Sender: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> ReplyTo: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [H] AMD Zacate... whoa.
> Sent: Nov 10, 2010 8:41 AM
>
> Way higher then atom wattage so not sure about netbooks
>
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 2:41 AM, CW <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XH5A4D9qoDQ&feature=related
>>
>> Is AMD ready to set the netbook world on it's ear? 18W part, 1080P
>> acceleration, dual core, and from what everyone is saying a 6320 video card
>> APU, which is roughly equal to a desktop ATI5400.. if this holds up, in a
>> sub $400 laptop world, this would be a game changer.
>>
>
> Sent via BlackBerry
