Something weird I did notice about Chrome... It doesn't install into the standard Program Files directory.
Instead Chrome installs into: "HOMEDIR\Local Settings\Application Data\Google\Chrome\Application\chrome.exe" Means that on the one terminal server computer we have at work, it has to be installed for each user individually. Not sure if there is a way around that (I haven't investigated). Scott On Dec 17, 2011, at 8:51 PM, Joshua MacCraw wrote: > Good to know. The profile being fixes path only matters if you need to move > the folder like I do since multi user is handled by using separate windows > accounts. > > Can't remember why I did not use a symlink. Something to try since I would > like to at least know chrome for support. > On Dec 17, 2011 5:45 PM, "Scott Sipe" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Chrome: >> >> 1) I guess still no profiles...doesn't matter for my single user usage. >> 2) NotScript extension -- works well >> 3) Adblock Plus extension -- works very well >> >> Scott >> >> On Dec 17, 2011, at 8:33 PM, Joshua MacCraw wrote: >> >>> + 1, sounds like bad add-on or corrupted profile. >>> >>> Chrome caveats : >>> >>> 1. No profile support >>> 2. No NoScript or equivalent >>> 3. No AdBlock >>> >>> #1 is deal breaker for me since I run from an encrypted volume not my >>> userprofile folder. The rest means flying with your pants down unless >>> something has changed. >>> >>> If all 3 were fixed I'd consider using it again. FF & chrome are the only >>> worthwhile choices IMHO. >>> On Dec 17, 2011 6:35 AM, "Thane Sherrington" < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> At 09:44 AM 17/12/2011, Anthony Q. Martin wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'm looking to move away from Firefox because it crashes too much. >>>>> >>>> >>>> If you're having a lot of FF crashes, you've got other problems. I run >> FF >>>> 24x7 and experience maybe one crash per month. >>>> >>>> T >>>> >>>> >> >>
