Cesar Eduardo Barros wrote: > Not incorrectly, just following table 1-1 (the whole pinout was probably > copied from there or from a nearby table).
Ah yes, the inconsistency is Samsung's. Normally, they call it UEXTCLK, except at this one place. > So far, nobody (except perhaps Joerg) seems to have checked the routing > and possible issues with having a 48MHz signal there. Yup, but we can't really help him with the layout ... and all the other aspects look good. - Werner _______________________________________________ hardware mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/hardware
