Am Mo 22. September 2008 schrieb Andy Green: > Somebody in the thread at some point said: > > | and *then* continue to look for good fixes for already existing ones, > this > | request gets torn down by an immediate vivid discussion about > contamination > | pathes etc., leaving impression to TPE EE we are not on same page > about doing > | new PCB to include EMI-filters on 3 contacts of JK4401. > > If we're making an A8 today we should add them, solely on the basis > that's the only thing we found that affects it at all. But, I don't > think we make an A8 today. > > What we need to increase our understanding of the whole problem if we > can in the meanwhile and see if we can find more attacks elsewhere and a > different way to come at it. That is why the difficult question about > paths keeps returning. Really the bead impact is clue to the larger > problem structure, not a solution in itself (although if we don't get > any further, that's all we have to play with). > > -Andy >
I definitively resign. /j
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ hardware mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/hardware
