-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Werner Almesberger wrote: > Andy Green wrote: >> BTW A lot of confusion is caused by this 4/94 type report in iwconfig, >> if there is no valid information driven by bit error rate floating >> around for that maybe an interesting patch would be to take the dBm >> figure and say add 100 to it or something and report / 100, so at least >> the figure here is sane.
> The noise level is probably simply meaningless. My laptop seems to Yeah the current number is pretty certainly bogus. But as a customer, you see 4/94 from it, you naturally think you have poor reception. I was saying maybe there is an easy patch there going into the IOCTL stuff that iwconfig uses and putting something more meaningful in this returned member. - -Andy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkjp18wACgkQOjLpvpq7dMpSUwCdHiuiIoKQbxj4qQDjJKuf2+qZ 5BgAnj+DqAisyGCxdXqqefAm52sKfeD8 =1QdP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ hardware mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/hardware
