n 05/11/11 15:58, Bradley Grainger wrote: > It does seem like this would need a destructor, too, to avoid leaking > CRITICAL_SECTION objects (unless they're only ever destroyed at process > shutdown, when it wouldn't be necessary).
That was the idea. But I added it anyway. Not that we explicitly support unloading the DLL... > Of course, then the struct would need to be made non-copyable to avoid > inadvertent early destruction. Good point. Thanks. Pushed. behdad _______________________________________________ HarfBuzz mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
