On 03/02/2012 09:51 AM, Grigori Goronzy wrote: > Have you thought about adding support for gcc's atomic intrinsics? They > are somewhat portable. I posted a patch for that a few months ago (not > sure if it is entirely correct).
I'll go ahead and pick those up. I'm not excited by the spinlock mutex implementation, but given how much configure.ac work it is to correctly use pthread, I'm happy to use your implementation and let anyone multithreading and not having glib on Linux to worry about it themselves. Thanks again. I'll try to pick up your other changes too. behdad > I have used this in my personal tree and it seems to work fine, see [1]. > > Best regards, > Grigori > > [1] > http://code.google.com/p/libass/source/detail?r=e80e911e8af19f525a4ba7f47b4524518e14b1f6&repo=harfbuzz# > _______________________________________________ > HarfBuzz mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz > _______________________________________________ HarfBuzz mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
