On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 12:33 +0530, Shriramana Sharma wrote: > On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Pravin Satpute <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Indic shaper supports some non-indic scripts as well. So yes, using > > generic name looks logical. > > But I prefer something other than "reordering", because that doesn't > really seem to be the catch term for Indic. Indic is, well, Indic. Or > maybe Brahmic. Reordering, split-positioning, conjoining forms and > ligatures -- these are what characterize Indic. What single term can > be appropriate to cover all of them without prejudice to another?
syllabic ... cya, # _______________________________________________ HarfBuzz mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
