Ah, sorry. My bad. I thought the sequences you listed are supposed to reproduce the problem by themselves.
I'll test with marks added. On the positive side, Jonathan and I found a GDEF/GSUB issue and fixed it today, which I'm fairly sure was causing this. Commits (and day1 report) coming soon. behdad On 07/16/2012 01:37 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote: > Attached two screenshots, first line with no vowel marks used and second > line with vowel marks used (the placement of the vowel marks themselves > it off, but that is because the glyphs lack proper anchors). > > Regards, > Khaled > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:13:01AM -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: >> Humm. Can you send screenshots? I get exact same output from both fonts, >> using both the OT and Uniscribe shapers. >> >> behdad >> >> On 07/15/2012 04:01 AM, Khaled Hosny wrote: >>> It seems that the (older) MarkAttachmentType lookup flag is not applied >>> by HarfBuzz, while the (newer) UseMarkFilteringSet flag works fine. >>> >>> Here is the same font font once using MarkAttachmentType and once using >>> UseMarkFilteringSet with the same mark glyph class in both cases (and it >>> is the only one used), and if applied the final dots in the words تختة, >>> تخنة, تخئة, تخثة and تخٹة should be raised up whether vowel marks are >>> used or not. >>> >>> http://khaledhosny.org/files/tmp/hussaini-nastaleeq_MarkAttachmentType.ttf >>> http://khaledhosny.org/files/tmp/hussaini-nastaleeq_UseMarkFilteringSet.ttf >>> >>> Regards, >>> Khaled >>> _______________________________________________ >>> HarfBuzz mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz _______________________________________________ HarfBuzz mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
