On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Rajeesh K Nambiar <[email protected]> wrote: > > From the in-tree test file, test cases 15, 19, 20, 53 and 54 all > involve 'Ra'. Case 5 (കാര്ക്കോടകന്) involves 'RA+ZWJ' in the middle > of the word. At present all are failing (interestingly, case 5 was > fine during the crash ;-)).
Hello -- running your sequence through UniView (http://rishida.net/scripts/uniview/) shows me that the sequence you have used is actually RA + VIRAMA + ZWJ (and not RA + ZWJ). However, ever since the encoding of the atomic chillu-s, the above sequence is no longer recommended for producing the chillu-RA because it would cause distinct encoded sequences to be rendered the same. As such I think it is not advisable for HB to support the old sequence RA + VIRAMA + ZWJ. Behdad might like to ask about this on the Unicode (or Unicore, if he has access) before implementing support for those old sequences. > Also noticed that post-base 'LA' is not correctly rendered for 'സ്പ്ലേ'. Can you clarify what you mean by *post*-base LA? You mean *sub*-base LA? Because AFAIK only YA and VA have post-base forms, but perhaps I am mistaken... -- Shriramana Sharma _______________________________________________ HarfBuzz mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
