-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 13-09-23 03:25 PM, أحمد المحمودي wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 02:58:11PM -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: >> Humm. Which one? Not that I intended, since I don't remember doing it >> on purpose nor do I see any entry in NEWS file. > ---end quoted text--- > > Sorry, my mistake, it is just that you moved hb_gobject_* symbols to > another library.
Right. That was the last piece of unstable API I wanted to get out of the library. Leaves the one hb_ot_shape_glyphs_closure() left to move out. I'll get to that eventually. I was planning to keep hb-ft and hb-glib API in libharfbuzz. However, recently we've hit a new roadbloack: freetype plans to depend on harfbuzz (for substitute-closure stuff, such that the autohinter can find all "Latin" glyphs). This is a big problem for packagers. I can separate hb-ft into a separate library, but can't move it into a separate repo as hb-view / hb-shape need it. Any ideas? How do you guys deal with these things? - -- behdad http://behdad.org/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlJAmxcACgkQn+4E5dNTERXtWQCfXGMqmK0DwKP56UwOno2kKjsm 5xgAn0Kalh5VdrVpuxe+HtdUnLfRQmVw =t7zE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ HarfBuzz mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
