On Tue, 1 Oct 2013 08:26:29 +0700 Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Richard Wordingham > <[email protected]> wrote: > Relying on 'mkmk' is a little bit costly, as it would need two sets > of glyphs under different GDEF's for each combining vowel. And > currently, most fonts are not prepared for this. However, it looks > more feasible to cover minority languages. I don't understand the need for 'two sets of glyphs under different GDEF's for each combining vowel'. On the other hand, a mkmk lookup might become about 7 times as large when one includes all pairs of marks above. Combinations of marks below with one another further increase the amount of mkmk lookup. Richard. _______________________________________________ HarfBuzz mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
