Right. ICU hit this same issue. Enviado desde nuestro iPhone.
El oct 22, 2013, a las 3:40 a.m., Behdad Esfahbod <[email protected]> escribió: > BTW, it's not safe to use any number beyond 31 at all since shift >= width of > type is undefined in C and I've seen instances of the processor not doing what > you expect in such cases. IIRC some processors, x86 even, ignore the top bits > of the shift count.
_______________________________________________ HarfBuzz mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
