Cool! Thanks!
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:58:04 +0000, Jonathan Kew wrote:
On 29/10/13 10:49, eduardo wrote:
Is there any reason other than the kerning? Bacause it can be
extracted
quite easily using the FT_Get_Kerning function.
Many reasons. GPOS positioning is far more flexible than just kern
pairs. E.g. there could be a simple kern for "To", but a different
kern value to be used when the "o" has a combining accent following
it.
FT_Get_Kerning will only report simple kern pairs from the 'kern'
table (if present); I don't think it even looks at GPOS, and it
certainly can't return any meaningful data about more general
positioning rules.
Maybe you should read up about the OpenType layout process...
http://www.microsoft.com/typography/SpecificationsOverview.mspx
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:40:59 +0000, Jonathan Kew wrote:
On 29/10/13 10:19, eduardo wrote:
Hi,
Why does hb return a list of advances when, given a glyph, it can
easily
be extracted from the font? Are the glyph advances context
dependant? If
so, what is a good language/script to see the difference?
Yes, of course they're context-dependent. The simplest example may
be
kerning. If the GPOS table contains a kern pair for "AV", then the
advances you get from harfbuzz for the 'A' and 'V' glyphs will not
be
the same as the individual glyph advances you'd find in the font.
_______________________________________________
HarfBuzz mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
_______________________________________________
HarfBuzz mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
_______________________________________________
HarfBuzz mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
_______________________________________________
HarfBuzz mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
