On 29/10/13 23:03, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
On 13-10-29 10:10 PM, Jonathan Kew wrote:
So I'd suggest it's worth doing something like this - unless of course you
want to go the whole way and implement "smart" plan caching with user
features, but IMO that sounds like it might be more effort than it's worth.
Thanks Jonathan. Yes, something along these lines is what I wanted to do. My
only hesitation was that plans are cached indefinitely on the face, but if we
only cache global-only plans, I'm still quite comfortable with that.
I wondered whether perhaps we should limit the number of plans that a
face can cache - start discarding old plans if the number goes past
about 10 or so. That would degrade gracefully and avoid uncontrolled
growth if a badly-coded (or malicious!) site keeps adding random (or
duplicated) features to the list, but still give the performance boost
for any normal use-cases.
Will clean up and pick this one. May take a week or so though as I'll be at
Iceland Airwaves for the rest of the week.
Cheers,
_______________________________________________
HarfBuzz mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
