Hi, Someone reported an issue with the hireq placement under the yodh with Ezra SIL font[1]. When I checked this, it seemed to be because HarfBuzz is composing U+05D9 + U+05B4 to U+FB1D and the font has a glyph for U+FB1D that has a not so good placement for hireq.
I thought this composition is result of Unicode normalisation, so HarfBuzz is doing the right thing, but the comment in hb-ot-shape-complex-hebrew.cc:75 indicates otherwise. I’m no very sure, but I feel this kind of composition should fits more into fallback shaping like done with Arabic and not something to be done unconditionally, WDYT? Regards, Khaled 1. http://tex.stackexchange.com/q/156775/729 _______________________________________________ HarfBuzz mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
