On 15-01-27 09:40 AM, Jonathan Kew wrote: > Meaning basically an API that accepts 16-bit codepoints but does not handle > surrogate pairs, so it would in effect support UCS-2 rather than UTF-16? I > doubt there's much of a use-case for that.
Yes, in case you or anyone has a 16bit representation for when all chars are <= 0xFFFF. But since no one has it right now, lets forget about that. So, happy to keep the latin1 name I guess. -- behdad http://behdad.org/ _______________________________________________ HarfBuzz mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
