A side note, if the docs are updated, note that the LE engine isn’t just deprecated in ICU… it’s gone, as of 58
-s El 12/5/16 7:15 AM, "HarfBuzz en nombre de Elmar Braun" <harfbuzz-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org en nombre de elmar.br...@sh-p.de> escribió: >Hello, > >I've built HarfBuzz 1.3.3 with Visual Studio using the provided NMake build >files. I have two questions though: > >Building with "ICU=1" produces two DLLs: harfbuzz-vs14.dll, which, as far as >I can tell, uses ucdn for Unicode data, and does not depend on ICU; and >harfbuzz-icu-vs14.dll, which isn't a complete HarfBuzz DLL. (It exports just >three symbols: hb_icu_get_unicode_funcs, hb_icu_script_from_script, and >hb_icu_script_to_script.) I'm sure there's a perfectly good explanation for >that, but that explanation is not obvious to me. Why doesn't it simply build >HarfBuzz in a single DLL that depends directly on ICU? > >Secondly, in win32\README.txt it describes the "ICU" option as follows: > > > ICU: Enables the build HarfBuzz-ICU, which is now the recommended layout >engine > > for ICU (International Components for Unicode), which deprecated ICU >LE. > >That reads like a description of icu-le-hb to me. But my understanding is >that icu-le-hb is separate, and not included with HarfBuzz. So isn't that >text plain wrong? > >Best regards, >Elmar >_______________________________________________ >HarfBuzz mailing list >HarfBuzz@lists.freedesktop.org >https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz _______________________________________________ HarfBuzz mailing list HarfBuzz@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz