On 11/29/18 7:29 AM, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 8:34 PM Ansel Sermersheim
<an...@copperspice.com <mailto:an...@copperspice.com>> wrote:
On 11/19/2018 07:16 PM, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
Hi Ansel,
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 7:44 PM Ansel Sermersheim
<an...@copperspice.com <mailto:an...@copperspice.com>> wrote:
...We have tried cluster
levels 0 and 1, and neither one worked as we expected. In
every case,
combining accents are marked as being in a separate cluster
to the base
codepoint. For example, U+0061 Latin Small Letter A followed
by U+0308
Combining Diaeresis are being placed in adjacent clusters
rather than
the same cluster.
That doesn't sound right. Are you setting any custom
unicode-funcs on the buffer? Only thing I can think of that can
do this is faulty / missing Unicode funcs.
We had a feeling something was missing. No, we are not supplying
any unicode funcs. Do you have a sample or documentation reference
for what we need to supply?
Not supplying anything is good. Was just ruling out that as a cause.
I have looked at the online documentation without seeing a clear
list of what is required. We are specifically looking to use
harfbuzz to decipher special case grapheme breaks.
Can you check with hb-shape command-line tool, to make sure what you
expect is what HarfBuzz produces there?
Sorry it took a while to get back with you, we really do appreciate your
help. We have been looking over the code and we believe we are having a
problem with missing unicode callback functions. We are compiling
HarfBuzz with the following options turned on:
-DHAVE_ATEXIT
-DHB_EXTERN=
-DHB_NO_UNICODE_FUNCS
-DHB_NDEBUG
I am particularly suspicious of the HB_NO_UNICODE_FUNCS define. Am I
correct in thinking that this is suppressing the built-in harfbuzz
unicode functions, so we must supply our own?
Thanks so much for your continued help and support,
-Ansel
_______________________________________________
HarfBuzz mailing list
HarfBuzz@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz