yep. makes sense (dropping [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- dims
On 5/12/05, Santiago Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > El jue, 12-05-2005 a las 13:08 -0400, Davanum Srinivas escribió: > > if we use classpath...we will need the 2 kinds of hooks into classpath > > (see http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/ for the links) > > The I guess the statement should rather be: > > - code in ASF SVN repository can "import" from classpath jars. > > i.e. s/Java//, because the only hooks caring about license dissonance > would be those from the VMs (which could be written in a number of > languages) and classpath itself. The VMs could be written in a number of > languages, including C# or java itself (IBM had such a beastie, IIRC). > > Which lends to a natural proposal: put the native code hooks in > Classpath into a BSDish or PD license, and we have a nice interface for > different groups (JVM writers, java library writers) to write to, > meeting there from both directions if needed. WDYT? > > Regards (I subscribed today to harmony-dev and have not looked into the > archives yet, which could make this idea completely redundant. Sorry if > so.) > -- > Santiago Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > High Sierra Technology, SLU > > > BodyID:1002374037.2.n.logpart (stored separately) > > -- Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
